Phonology

Transcription

In these pages I am using a system of transcription which broadly reflects the priestly pronunciation (the most broadly influential dialect) of the late 9th century (Imperial Reckoning). The native syllabary reflects the pronunciation of about a millenium earlier, and would be unduly confusing.

I have toyed with several transcription schemes; here I am using ‘q-notation’. There is also ‘x-notation’ (identical but for the use of <x> where q-notation has <q>) and ‘short notation’ (which has <x>, <q>, <c> for <sq>, <zq>, <nq>). I personally favour the last, but others have objected to the use of <c> for the velar nasal.

Consonants

The consonants are shown below, together with their IPA and X-SAMPA explanations:

transcription IPA X-SAMPA

p p p t t t tj c c k k k
b b b d d d dj ɟ J\ g ɡ g
f f f s s s sj ç C sq x x h h h
v v v z z z zj ʝ j\ zq ɣ G
m m m n n n nj ɲ J nq ŋ N
r r r
l l l lj ʎ L
y j j w w w

There is, unsurprisingly, considerable dialectal variation, particularly in the point of articulation of the palatal series, which appears frequently as far forward as palato-alveolar (especially in the case of the fricatives).

Vowels

A simple 5-vowel system; IPA and X-SAMPA are the same:

i u
e o
a

There is no constrastive vowel length, nasalisation, or anything else interesting. Diphthongs are purely a matter of /y/ or /w/ appearing in the coda (note I am using q-notation even here). Phonetically, though, vowels do lengthen in open syllables (i.e. those ending in the vowel).

Syllables and Stress

The syllable structure is CVC, with any consonant able to appear in either position.

The stress accent is not predictable. I mark it in transcription with an acute accent unless it falls on the first syllable of the word (which is the case in most nouns). Doubtless certain words (such as common postpositions) lack stress, and so this omission takes away complete clarity of pronunciation, but I want to avoid diactritics in names as much as possible.

Sound Changes

The fairly recent loss of noninitial unaccented vowels (before which the syllable structure was (C)V; current "unaccented" vowels had secondary stress) has led to the juxtaposition of consonants, some of which underwent changes. These changes are active synchronically at this period, and so need mention. (For the purposes of these rules /w/ does not count as a velar, despite its placement in the chart above.)

In tabular form (where the consonant in the left column is the first of the cluster, and showing the results only where there are changes):

p b m t d s z n r l tj dj sj zj nj ly y k g sq zq nq h
p bb bm bd bn bdj bnj bg bnq
b pp pt ptj pk ph
f ff
v vf
t db dm dd dn tjtj djdj dnj dg dnq
d tp tt tjtj djdj tk th
s ss
z zs
n njtj njdj njsj njzj njnj njlj njy
r rr
l ljtj ljdj ljsj ljzj ljnj ljlj ljy
tj djb djm tt dd djn djdj djnj kk gg djnq
dj tjp tt dd tjtj kk gg tjh
sj sqsq sqzq sjsj
zj zqsq zqzq zjsj
nj nt nd ns nz nn nr nl nqk nqg nqsq nqzq nqnq
lj lt ld ls lz ln lr ll lk lg lsq lzq lnq
k gb gm gd gn gdj gnj gg gnq
g kp kt ktj kk kh
sq sjsj sjzj sqsq
zq zjsj zjzj zqsq

Note also that homosyllabic /iy/ becomes /i/ and homosyllabic /uw/ becomes /u/.

I discovered an error in my Middle Holic to Early Modern Holic script while writing this; I hope this has not caused any significant problems. Also, in the examples of Holic so far produced it is possible I have forgotten to apply these sound changes in some instances.